يوسف، ايناس فوزيAl-Ansari, Samar Mohammed2024-01-092024-01-092018https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14154/70701Background: Neck pain is a public health problem and a common source of disability.Result: Both groups had significant improvement of pain, disability and psychological factors. Cervical PPT was significantly improved in Maitland group only but the tibialis PPT was significantly improved for both groups.Conclusion: Both mobilization techniques can improve neck pain, Disability and psychological variables with no significant difference between them.enPhysical Therapymusculoskeletal systemMaitland Mobilization versus Mulligan Mobilization in Sub-acute and Chronic Non-specific Neck PainThesis