CODIFYING INHUMANITY: LEGAL FOUNDATIONS, RACIALIZATION, AND DEHUMANIZATION IN THE CONSTRUCTION AND PERPETUATION OF AMERICAN AND NORTH CAROLINA CHATTEL SLAVERY

dc.contributor.advisorH. Knox, John
dc.contributor.advisorJ. Morath, Sarah
dc.contributor.authorSalah, Yuossof
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-14T06:47:42Z
dc.date.issued2024-06-12
dc.description.abstractThis dissertation argues that American chattel slavery, from its earliest inception, was developed through a deliberate legal framework that systematically transformed people of African descent into property, institutionalizing mechanisms of systematic dehumanization and violence to maintain the institution of racial bondage. By examining British, international, colonial, and constitutional laws, this study demonstrates how multiple legal systems actively and collectively constructed and perpetuated slavery in America rather than merely tolerating it. Furthermore, this analysis traces the legal interconnections between these systems across continents and time periods to reveal their role in codifying and legitimizing the forced commodification of human beings. Through analysis of key legal documents, including British court rulings, colonial slave codes, international treaties, and the U.S. Constitution, this dissertation challenges perspectives that position slavery as “a private matter,” underdeveloped, or merely a local matter outside or in contrast to the established legal order. Instead, the research argues that law and legal institutions were central to normalizing racial enslavement and embedding it within American jurisprudence. This study also argues that racial enslavement was enforced and sustained through systemic racial violence, institutionalizing mechanisms of “collective cruelty.” This system of "Collective Cruelty" served to suppress both individual and collective resistance among the enslaved population. The analysis contends that African enslavement and state-sanctioned violence were inextricably linked throughout both the mainland colonies and American constitutional eras. This dissertation finally explores North Carolina's unique legal foundations, where “absolute slavery” was instituted from its inception, demonstrating how legal frameworks did not merely accommodate slavery, but actively created, legitimized, and sustained a system of racial bondage through explicit mechanisms of dehumanization and commodification.
dc.format.extent493
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14154/74640
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherWake Forest University
dc.subjectChattel Slavery
dc.subjectRacialization
dc.subjectDehumanization
dc.subjectLegal History of Slavery
dc.subjectAmerican Slavery
dc.subjectColonial Slave Codes
dc.subjectNorth Carolina Slavery
dc.subjectConstitutional Compromises
dc.subjectBritish Slave Trade
dc.subjectAfrican Diaspora
dc.subjectTransatlantic Slave Trade
dc.subjectRacialized Bondage
dc.subjectSystemic Violence
dc.subjectSlavery in International Law
dc.subjectSlave Patrols
dc.subjectSlave Courts
dc.subjectFundamental Constitutions of Carolina
dc.subjectRacial Subjugation
dc.subjectLegal Frameworks of Enslavement
dc.subjectBlack Chattel Identity.
dc.subjectEnslaved Personhood
dc.subjectSystemic Racial Oppression
dc.subjectInstitutionalized Racial Bondage
dc.subjectThree-Fifths Clause
dc.subjectFugitive Slave Clause
dc.subjectSlave Trade Clause
dc.subjectHereditary Bondage
dc.subjectAbsolute Slavery.
dc.titleCODIFYING INHUMANITY: LEGAL FOUNDATIONS, RACIALIZATION, AND DEHUMANIZATION IN THE CONSTRUCTION AND PERPETUATION OF AMERICAN AND NORTH CAROLINA CHATTEL SLAVERY
dc.typeThesis
sdl.degree.departmentSchool of Law
sdl.degree.disciplineLaw
sdl.degree.grantorWake Forest University
sdl.degree.nameDoctor of Juridical Science (S.J.D.)

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
SACM-Dissertation.pdf
Size:
6.22 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.61 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed to upon submission
Description:

Copyright owned by the Saudi Digital Library (SDL) © 2025