TRANSCRIPTOMIC ANALYSES REVEAL DISTINCT RESPONSES OF DIFFERENTIATED AND POORLY-DIFFERENTIATED INTESTINAL EPITHELIAL CELLS TO LIPID PEROXIDES
No Thumbnail Available
Date
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Abstract
Lipid peroxides (LOOHs) abound in processed food and have been implicated in the
pathology of diverse diseases including gut, cardiovascular, and cancer diseases. However, the
molecular mechanisms by which LOOHs contribute to disease have not been fully characterized.
Caco-2 cells have been widely used to model human intestinal epithelium in metabolic studies.
As differentiated (Diff) and poorly-differentiated (PDiff) Caco-2 cells represent good models of
human enterocytes and intestinal tumor cells, respectively, we investigated the cellular response
of Diff and PDiff Caco-2 cells to the most common dietary LOOH, 13-
hydroperoxyoctadecadienoic acid (13-HPODE), in terms of differential gene expression, gene
ontology and pathway analysis using transcriptomic profiling. This dissertation demonstrates the
work conducted on Diff and PDiff Caco-2 cells in order to understand how LOOHs might
contribute to disease in the intestinal epithelium. We also compare between the responses of Diff
and PDiff cells to LOOHs as Diff cells resemble mature-like enterocytes (have brush borders)
and PDiff cells model intestinal cancer cells or crypt cells (lack brush borders). To characterize
gene expression and pathway dysregulation upon exposure to peroxidized linoleic acid, we
incubated Diff and PDiff intestinal epithelial cells (Caco-2) with 100μM of 13-
hydroperoxyoctadecadienoic acid (13-HPODE), linoleic acid (LA) or hydrogen peroxide (H2O2)
for 24h. Total RNA was extracted for library preparation and Illumina HiSeq sequencing.
This dissertation demonstrates that the Diff and PDiff Caco-2 cells, which differ in their
phenotype, behavior and gene expression, show significant differences in their response to the
most common dietary lipid peroxide, 13-HPODE, although some similarities in the enriched
processes of both cell types were observed. Both cell types showed enrichment of PPAR
iv
signaling, cytochrome P450, oxidative phosphorylation and membrane transporters which
support previous studies reported the effect of 13-HPODE on these processes. In addition, 13-
HPODE treatment had a significant effect on steroid hormone biosynthesis, RNA processing and
ribosome biogenesis in both types of cells. On the other hand, Diff cells showed enrichment of
bile conjugation upon 13-HPODE treatment which could provide a link between 13-HPODE’s
detergent activity and cell phenotype. The significant impact of 13-HPODE on cell cycle and
DNA replication/repair in Diff cells might indicate an effect on cellular differentiation and
apoptosis. In PDiff cells, more defense mechanisms were triggered by 13-HPODE than in Diff
cells. In addition to cytochrome P450, retinol metabolism and peroxisomal pathway were
enriched in PDiff cells indicating a stronger defense mechanism was triggered in PDiff than Diff
cells. Moreover, phospholipid biosynthesis, amino acid and glycogen metabolism enrichment in
PDiff cells, but not in Diff cells, upon 13-HPODE treatment was an indication of tumorigenic
environment and malignant transformation.
This research using Caco-2 cells provides insights into the physiological changes that
might occur in the intestinal epithelial cells upon exposure to 13-HPODE and the possible
mechanisms by which it contributes to disease development or progression in intestinal
epithelium. Our results also support that Diff and PDiff Caco-2 cells differ in their response to
13-HPODE.