A COMPARISON BETWEEN TWO SCORING METHODS, HOLISTIC VS ANALYTIC, USING TWO MEASUREMENT MODELS, THE GENERALIZABILITY THEORY AND THE MANY-FACET RASCH MEASUREMENT, WITHIN THE CONTEXT OF PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT
dc.contributor.author | EID RADINI J. HARBI | |
dc.date | 2006 | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-06-01T15:21:35Z | |
dc.date.available | 2022-06-01T15:21:35Z | |
dc.degree.department | Ph.D. | |
dc.identifier.other | 5842 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://drepo.sdl.edu.sa/handle/20.500.14154/58152 | |
dc.language.iso | en_US | |
dc.publisher | Saudi Digital Library | |
dc.title | A COMPARISON BETWEEN TWO SCORING METHODS, HOLISTIC VS ANALYTIC, USING TWO MEASUREMENT MODELS, THE GENERALIZABILITY THEORY AND THE MANY-FACET RASCH MEASUREMENT, WITHIN THE CONTEXT OF PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT | |
dc.type | Thesis | |
sdl.thesis.level | Doctoral | |
sdl.thesis.source | SACM - United States of America |