Saudi Cultural Missions Theses & Dissertations
Permanent URI for this communityhttps://drepo.sdl.edu.sa/handle/20.500.14154/10
Browse
2 results
Search Results
Item Restricted The Potential Impact of Nursing Workload and Work Environment on Nurses Leading them to Ration or Miss Care in ICU Settings: A Systematic Review.(Queen’s University, Belfast, 2024-03-19) Aldossary, Amani; McMullan, JohannaTitle: The Potential Impact of Nursing Workload and Work Environment on Nurses Leading them to Ration or Miss Care in ICU Settings: A Systematic Review. Background: Intensive Care Units (ICUs) provide life-saving care to critically sick patients resulting in numerous challenges for nurses (Moradi et al., 2021). Heavy workloads, time limits, and resource shortages all contribute to a problem known as "rationing of nursing care," in which essential tasks are left undone because of limitations. Addressing nurse needs and building supportive work cultures are critical elements in maintaining quality care for everyone in ICUs. Aim: Objectives: To examine how the nurses’ workload and work environment could potentially impact nurses to ration and miss care in ICU settings. 1. To identify what aspects of ICU care could be affected by the rationing of nursing care. 2. To investigate if ICU workload and work environment lead nurses to care rationing. 3. Exploring what measures could be implemented to limit the rationing of nursing care in ICU settings. Methodology: A systematic review, started with comprehensive electronic search of databases, and a meticulously crafted search strategy was done to identify a relevant latest published articles. Full texts were subsequently screened for eligible studies, ultimately leading to the inclusion of thirteen studies, nine were quantitative studies, one qualitative study, and three mixed-methods studies. Conclusion: Thirteen research that were evaluated for validity and relevance shed light on the factors that lead to care rationing. High workload, patient-to-nurse ratios, a poor work environment, resource limitations, and job satisfaction emerge as major factors. Notably, while the quality of the research varies, they all demonstrate significant rationed care, with activities such as ambulation and patient comfort falling victim. Interestingly, no reported missed care was identified in a patient-focused investigation, implying a potential gap between nurses' and patients' perspectives.33 0Item Restricted Nurses’ Safety Attitudes and their impact on Nursing-Sensitive Patient Outcomes(Saudi Digital Library, 2023-10-09) Alanazi, Faisal Khalaf; Sim, Jenny; Lapkin, Samuel; Molloy, LukeBackground: Nurses represent the largest proportion of healthcare workers and are in close contact with patients. Each nurse has a unique set of attitudes towards their duties and roles. Understanding nurses’ attitudes towards safety allows organisations to identify individual practices and behaviours that may have an impact on patient outcomes. Nursing-sensitive patient outcomes, such as patient falls and pressure injuries, significantly impact patients and healthcare organisations. Therefore, nursing unit characteristics, such as safety attitudes, quality of care, missed care, and staffing levels, might improve patient outcomes. To date, evidence on the association between these characteristics and nursing-sensitive patient outcomes, using empirical patient data, is limited and inconsistent. Aim: The aim of this project was to examine the impact of nurses’ attitudes towards safety, quality of care, missed care and staffing levels, on four nursing-sensitive patient outcomes, collected from two sources of data in five acute Ministry of Health (MOH) hospitals in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA). The four nursing-sensitive patient outcomes included patient falls, pressure injuries, healthcare-associated infections, and inpatient mortality. The project also explored the relationship between nursing-sensitive patient outcomes using two data sources, namely, nurses’ perceptions of the frequency of adverse patient outcomes in their units reported in a cross-sectional survey, and the incidence of nursing-sensitive patient outcomes reported in administrative data. Methods: A multi-site multi-source, cross-sectional project was conducted. The data were collected from 35 nursing units in five acute hospitals in two regions of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. In phase one, an online nurse survey gathered a comprehensive range of data, including the Safety Attitudes Questionnaire (SAQ), quality of care, missed care, nurse staffing levels, and nurses’ perceptions of the frequency of adverse patient outcomes. In phase two, secondary administrative datasets on patient falls, pressure injuries, healthcare-associated infections, and inpatient mortality for the years 2018, 2019, 2020, and 2021 were analysed for each participating hospital. Data from phases one and two were merged in phase three to address the project’s aim. A variety of descriptive analyses were performed, and inferential statistics, including logistic regression and Generalized Linear Models (GLM), were fitted to examine the association between project variables. Results: The SAQ mean score was 61.48 (SD = 12.9), suggesting that nurses had less than positive attitudes towards safety. The highest mean score was in safety behaviour (Mean = 66.25, SD = 18.6), and the lowest mean score was in working conditions (Mean = 52.2, SD = 21.4). Most nurses (n = 444, 72%) reported that at least 1 of the 13 nursing care activities had been missed on their last shift due to lack of time to complete it. The most frequently missed activity by nurses was comfort/talk with patients (n = 246, 37.7%). The average patient-to-nurse ratio was highest in surgical units (Mean = 5.87, SD = 0.88) and lowest in critical care units (Mean = 1.95, SD = 0.40). However, the results indicated that a strong overall safety culture score, safety behaviour (collaborations between nurses, physicians and pharmacists), safety climate (attitude towards organisation commitment to safety), and job satisfaction (attitudes towards work experience) were significantly associated with better nursing-sensitive patient outcomes. Similarly, higher hospital quality of care and lower missed care were associated with decreased adverse nursing-sensitive patient outcomes. Higher patient numbers per nurse were positively associated with higher incidence of Healthcare-Associated Infections (HAI) and nurses’ perceptions of the frequency of adverse patient outcomes. In addition, nurses’ perceptions of the frequency of adverse patient outcomes were associated positively with higher incidence rates of nursing-sensitive patient outcomes reported in administrative datasets. Conclusion: This project investigated the characteristics of nursing units and their impact on four nursing-sensitive patient outcomes in five acute hospitals in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. The project highlighted the importance of promoting a positive safety culture, improving the quality of care in nursing units, reducing missed care, and providing adequate staffing levels to enhance better patient outcomes. In addition, nurses’ perceptions of the frequency of adverse patient outcomes were reflective of the actual incidence rates of nursing-sensitive patient outcomes. Therefore, understanding nurses’ perceptions of adverse patient outcomes and addressing their concerns can be crucial in improving patient outcomes and promoting a positive safety culture in nursing units.44 0