Saudi Cultural Missions Theses & Dissertations
Permanent URI for this communityhttps://drepo.sdl.edu.sa/handle/20.500.14154/10
Browse
2 results
Search Results
Item Restricted The Personal Characteristics of Audit Committee Financial Experts, Audit Quality and Financial Reporting Quality(Saudi Digital Library, 2023-11-29) Alrudayni, Ashwag; Clark, ColinThe financial expertise of audit committee members has received a lot of attention in academic research due to the significant role the committee plays in the quality of financial reporting. However, the findings of these studies have either been ambiguous or very complex. This research examines the influences of audit committee financial experts’ personal characteristics (gender, industry expertise, multiple directorships, tenure, and ownership of shares) on financial reporting and audit quality. The cross-sectional version of the modified Jones model, in which discretionary accruals served as the earnings management proxy, was employed to measure the quality of financial reporting. Audit quality was measured using the natural logarithm of audit fees paid to incumbent auditors. Ten hypotheses were developed within an agency and resource dependence theories framework. These were tested using data collected from a sample of 860 firm-year observations of ASX publicly-listed firms for the period 2016 to 2020. Using ordinary least squares (OLS) regression, the results indicate that financial experts with ownership are more effective in reducing earnings management, while there is no relationship between financial experts’ gender, industry experience, tenure, or multiple directorships with earnings management. This suggests that ASX-listed firms with a higher average number of audit committee financial experts with shares ownership have a favourable effect on financial reporting quality in Australia. The results also show that financial experts with multiple directorships and industry knowledge increase audit fees while there is no relationship between financial experts’ gender and the ownership of stocks or shares and audit fees. These findings indicate that financial experts with industry experience and multiple outside seats have a deeper understanding of the specific financial and regulatory requirements of their industry and have gained valuable experience (including governance experience) from other boards. This gives them the skills and motivation to demand higher audit quality assurances from their auditors. In turn, this leads to a higher level of oversight and a greater need for audit services, resulting in higher audit fees. However, the average tenure of audit committee financial experts is negatively correlated with audit fees. This finding indicates that long-serving financial experts have greater knowledge and experience about the company’s financial operations, resulting in a more efficient and effective audit and lower fees for the auditor. A number of robustness and sensitivity tests were conducted to verify that the main results of the study were robust across different measurements and estimators. The findings of this study have clear implications for corporate management, firms, regulators, and scholars. This study generates important insights for two key corporate governance mechanisms: audit committee financial experts and external auditors. It also contributes to new knowledge on corporate governance, financial reporting quality, auditing, and accounting.24 0Item Restricted The Impact of Audit Market Concentration on Audit Quality: Evidence from Australia(Saudi Digital Library, 2023-11-03) Alismail, Faisal; Singh, AbhijeetThis study examines the impact of audit market concentration on audit quality (that is, audit fees, earnings management (discretionary accruals), and going concern opinion) in Australia. The analysis is crucial given ongoing concerns and uncertainty regarding the precise nature of the link between audit market concentration and audit quality. Furthermore, this analysis is necessary to determine whether current regulation is adequately prepared to improve audit quality in a highly concentrated audit market, or whether new regulations are required to improve audit quality. The hypotheses are developed within an agency theory framework and tested using data collected from publicly listed Australian firms for the period from 2010 to 2018. The sample for this study consists of 11,295 firm-year observations for the audit fees and earnings management models. In contrast, the going concern opinions model contains only the firms in financial distress, with a sample of 8,268 firm-year observations. This research contributes to the current literature by offering new and significant empirical insights into the relationship between audit market concentration and audit quality. The results of this study suggest that audit market concentration is positively associated with audit quality. Additionally, robustness and sensitivity test findings largely support the significance of the association between audit market concentration and audit quality. The findings of this study have significant implications for regulators, investors, scholars, corporate management, and auditors concerning the significance of audit market concentration in improving audit quality.43 0