General Anaesthetic Techniques and the Incidence of Acute Kidney Injury: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
dc.contributor.advisor | Ackland, Gareth | |
dc.contributor.author | Samman, Abeer | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-10-27T06:54:35Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2024 | |
dc.description | Systematic review | |
dc.description.abstract | Background: Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a critical postoperative complication. This study compares the incidence of AKI in adults undergoing non-cardiac surgery with propofol-based total intravenous anaesthesia (TIVA) versus sevoflurane-based volatile anaesthesia (VA). Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis of studies from 2000 to 2024 was conducted. The primary outcome was AKI incidence using KDIGO criteria, analyzed with a random-effects model. Secondary outcomes using RIFLE and AKIN criteria were qualitatively synthesized. Results: Seven studies involving 6,795 participants showed a lower AKI incidence in the TIVA group (3.63%) compared to the VA group (6.21%), with a pooled risk ratio of 0.586 (95% CI: 0.332 to 1.036, p = 0.066). Results were not statistically significant, and heterogeneity was high (I² = 73.0%). Conclusion: TIVA may reduce AKI incidence compared to VA, but further studies are needed. Novel biomarkers like NGAL and KIM-1 could improve early AKI detection and management. | |
dc.format.extent | 60 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14154/73319 | |
dc.language.iso | en | |
dc.publisher | Queen Mary University of London | |
dc.subject | Anesthesia | |
dc.subject | anaesthetic techniques | |
dc.subject | Acute Kidney Injury | |
dc.subject | Anaesthesia | |
dc.subject | AKI | |
dc.subject | TIVA | |
dc.subject | VA | |
dc.title | General Anaesthetic Techniques and the Incidence of Acute Kidney Injury: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis | |
dc.type | Thesis | |
sdl.degree.department | Critical Care | |
sdl.degree.discipline | Anaesthesia | |
sdl.degree.grantor | Queen Mary University of London | |
sdl.degree.name | Master of Science |