Business Analysis Report
Date
2023-09-12
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
University of Sussex
Abstract
The purpose of this report is to conduct a comparative appraisal of the financial performance of
two companies. The analysis primarily focuses on trends and ratio analysis. A comparative study
is undertaken utilising horizontal and vertical methods to examine historical data, in order to
ascertain the most preferable investment option between Marks and Spencer (M&S) and its
competitor Next, dependent upon their respective performances. This study utilises a combination
of methods, with historical data serving as the main focus.
Furthermore, historical data serves as a foundation for examining the cash flow status of the two
organisations, allowing a comparative analysis that supports decision making. This comparison
assists in identifying both companies' strengths and weaknesses. The data is acquired from the
company's annual reports and Fame website, spanning a five-year period from 2018 to 2022. The
financial valuation of M&S is included. The study concludes findings of the strengths,
weaknesses, opportunities and threats (SWOT) analysis show that Next outperformed M&S
during this five-year period. In addition, Next achieved higher profitability than M&S and better
outcomes in financial performance in these 5 years. The last part of the study contains the
conclusion and recommendations that would help final decision be made for different
stakeholders.
Description
Keywords
M&S, Next, Financial performance, Business Analysis