The Impact of Frailty and Comorbidities on Lung Cancer Screening Invitation Response, Low-Dose CT Uptake, and Selection Strategies
No Thumbnail Available
Date
2024
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
University of Leeds
Abstract
Lung cancer screening (LCS) using low-dose CT reduces lung cancer mortality
among individuals at high risk of the disease. This high-risk population may have
a higher incidence of frailty and multiple comorbidities, potentially due to the
influence of age and smoking history, compared to those undergoing screening
for other cancers. However, the incorporation of frailty and comorbidities into LCS
has not been thoroughly studied. This thesis aimed to investigate the prevalence
of frailty and comorbidities and their impact on LCS invitation response, low-dose
CT uptake, and selection strategies within the Yorkshire Lung Screening Trial
(YLST). Study One was a systematic review and meta-analysis that examined
the prevalence of comorbidities in the lung cancer screening population. This
study identified several prevalent comorbidities and highlighted the lack of frailty
assessment among individuals undergoing LCS. Study Two was a retrospective
case-control analysis that explored the prevalence of frailty and comorbidities, as
well as the response to the YLST lung cancer risk assessment invitation and
subsequent uptake of low-dose CT screening. The analysis revealed that frailty
of any degree was present in 47.9% of eligible individuals offered low-dose CT
appointments, including 16.2% with moderate to severe frailty. Interestingly,
individuals without frailty or comorbidities were less likely to respond to the risk
assessment invitation but showed higher participation in low-dose CT screening
when deemed eligible. Study Three was a retrospective comparative analysis
that evaluated frailty, comorbidities, and survival among populations eligible for
LCS, identified by different selection strategies. The study found that the risk
models currently used in the UK (PLCOm2012 and LLPv2) identified similar
populations in terms of frailty and comorbidities, with both models showing higher
prevalence than the USPSTF2021 criteria. However, three-year overall survival
appeared to be similar across all strategies. In conclusion, future LCS efforts
should focus on increasing participation rates amongst fit individuals with fewer
comorbidities (who appear less likely to take part currently) and comparing long
term outcomes across different levels of frailty and comorbidity.
Description
Keywords
Lung cancer screening, LDCT, Frailty, Risk score, comorbidity