Evaluation Of Surface Roughness And Marginal Microleakage Of Alkasite Material (Cention N) Versus Resin Modified Glass Ionomer In Class V Restoration In Primary Molars (In Vitro Study)

Abstract

Aim: The present study assesses the marginal microleakage of Alkasite material (Cention N) compared to resin-modified Glass Ionomer in restoring class V cavities in primary molars. Methodology: A total of 22 second primary molars were extracted, prepared for the Class V cavity, and subsequently divided into two groups (1 & 2), each containing 11 molars. The samples were restored using either material following the manufacturer's instructions. Marginal microleakage was assessed using the dye penetration assay using a scoring system (0-4), which was subsequently followed by microscopic examination with a stereomicroscope. The collected data were statistically analyzed and compared using the independent t-test at p<0.05 level of significance. Results: According to the findings, the occlusal and gingival margins of both restorative materials exhibited microleakage scoring levels between 1 and 4, with the Cention N group exhibiting higher microleakage scores at the occlusal margin. In comparison to Riva Light Cure, Cention N demonstrated marginal microleakage depths that were lower in both the occlusal and gingival margins. Conclusion: Both tested materials exhibited marginal microleakage, although Cention N was less than Riva Light Cure, suggesting the superiority of Cention N over Riva Light Cure in the sealing quality at the interface between the restoration and the tooth