Effectiveness of Photon-Counting CT for Metal Artefact Reduction in Musculoskeletal Imaging: A Structured Literature Review
No Thumbnail Available
Date
2026
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Saudi Digital Library
Abstract
Abstract
Aim: This structured literature review systematically evaluated the effectiveness of
photon-counting detector computed tomography (PCD-CT) for reducing metal artefacts
in musculoskeletal imaging involving orthopaedic implants.
Background: Metal artefacts from orthopaedic implants substantially degrade diagnostic
image quality in conventional computed tomography, compromising visualisation of
periprosthetic anatomy essential for detecting complications. With arthroplasty
procedures increasing substantially and photon-counting CT recently introduced into
clinical practice (2021), systematic evidence synthesis was required to establish
effectiveness, identify optimal imaging parameters, and determine clinical implementation
readiness.
Methods: A structured literature review was conducted following PRISMA guidelines.
PubMed was searched for studies published between 2019 and 2024 evaluating PCD
CT for metal artefact reduction in musculoskeletal imaging. Included studies were
appraised using the QUALSYST quality assessment tool. Data were extracted
systematically and synthesised narratively, examining quantitative artefact metrics,
subjective image quality assessments, and optimal reconstruction parameters.
Results: Five studies (134 patients plus phantom investigations) met inclusion criteria,
achieving good to excellent methodological quality ratings (73.1%-100%). PCD-CT
demonstrated substantial artefact reductions ranging from 59% to 83%, substantially
exceeding the 30-50% reductions typically achieved with conventional approaches.
Virtual monoenergetic imaging at 100-140 keV combined with iterative metal artefact
reduction algorithms emerged as optimal reconstruction strategies. Radiologists
consistently rated PCD-CT reconstructions as superior to comparator conditions, with
enhanced visualisation of periprosthetic bone, soft tissues, and adjacent anatomical
structures. Evidence limitations included modest sample sizes, single-vendor
concentration, predominance of retrospective designs, and absence of patient-important
outcome measures.
Conclusion: PCD-CT represents a significant technological advancement, providing
substantial and reproducible improvements in metal artefact reduction and image quality
in musculoskeletal imaging. Current evidence supports cautious clinical implementation
in centres with access to photon-counting CT systems, whilst highlighting essential
research priorities including larger prospective studies, multi-vendor evaluations, broader
implant representation, and patient-centred outcome research.
Description
Keywords
Photon-counting CT, PCCT, Metal artefact reduction, Computed Tomography, CT
