Maitland Mobilization versus Mulligan Mobilization in Sub-acute and Chronic Non-specific Neck Pain

Simple item page
dc.contributor.advisorيوسف، ايناس فوزي
dc.contributor.authorAl-Ansari, Samar Mohammed
dc.date.accessioned2024-01-09T17:39:32Z
dc.date.available2024-01-09T17:39:32Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.degree.departmentPhysical Therapy Department
dc.degree.grantorImam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University
dc.description.abstractBackground: Neck pain is a public health problem and a common source of disability.Result: Both groups had significant improvement of pain, disability and psychological factors. Cervical PPT was significantly improved in Maitland group only but the tibialis PPT was significantly improved for both groups.Conclusion: Both mobilization techniques can improve neck pain, Disability and psychological variables with no significant difference between them.
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14154/70701
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherImam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University
dc.subjectPhysical Therapy
dc.subjectmusculoskeletal system
dc.titleMaitland Mobilization versus Mulligan Mobilization in Sub-acute and Chronic Non-specific Neck Pain
dc.typeThesis
sdl.degree.nameMaster's Degree

Files

Collections

Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University

Copyright owned by the Saudi Digital Library (SDL) © 2025