EFFECT OF EDUCATIONAL BREAST CANCER SMARTPHONE APPLICATION ON KNOWLEDGE, HEALTH BELIEFS AND BREAST SELF-EXAMINATION PRACTICES AMONG FEMALE UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTS AT A COLLEGE UNIVERSITY IN SAUDI ARABIA
No Thumbnail Available
Date
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Abstract
Breast cancer is the most frequently diagnosed cancer and the leading cause of
cancerous deaths among females worldwide. In Saudi Arabia, breast cancer (BC) is
the leading cause of cancerous deaths among Saudi women. Early detection of
breast cancer can play an important role in reducing cancer morbidity and
mortality. Early detection could be promoted by increasing knowledge, and by
minimizing barriers about breast cancer. Previous studies have shown low breast
cancer awareness among young Saudi women. Web based and smartphone
applications covering a wide range of health topics including healthy lifestyle,
fitness, disease management, and public health are currently available across all
app stores with over 70% of them targeted at health. The main objective of this
study is to develop, implement and evaluate the effectiveness of the educational
program on breast cancer through a smartphone application based on knowledge,
breast self-examination practices and health beliefs related to breast cancer among
female students in university colleges in Saudi Arabia.
This study is comprised of two phases which are the development of an educational
application and also the evaluation of the educational protocol through a
randomized controlled trial (RCT) among female students. The first phase is based
on the qualitative approach and through a panel of experts, the final version of the
apps was prepared and validated. The second phase of the study was done through
a randomized controlled trial (RCT) for the selection of the participants. All female
students who fulfilled the study’s inclusion criteria were invited to participate in
the study with the provision of the informed consent form. Baseline data were
ii
collected from 144 female students (72 from the intervention group and 72 from
the control group).
The research instruments which included components on knowledge, practices,
health belief and technology acceptance were adapted and adopted based on the
literature. Content and face validity, on the other hand, were assessed by a panel of
experts, followed by a pilot study. The intervention module is composed of an
educational program on breast cancer and was validated and developed using a
smartphone application. The data were collected at baseline, one month, 3 months
and six months after intervention for both groups. The descriptive and inferential
statistics used were the two-way repeated measure ANOVA and Chi square test for
data analysis purpose using the SPSS software version 24.
The results of the two-way repeated measure ANOVA indicate that the level of
knowledge in the intervention group significantly increased after using the
application. According to these results, it was found that the frequency of selfexamination in the intervention group was (79.5%) in follow-up1 and increased to
86.3% in follow-up 2, which was significantly different from the control group
(p<0.001). These results also showed that the effects of intervention on the level of
health belief components (perceived seriousness, perceived susceptibility,
perceived benefits, perceived barriers, confidence and health motivation) in the pre,
post and follow-up tests in the intervention have increased significantly: perceived
seriousness [3.23(SP 0.36), 3.65(SD 0.53), 3.71(SD 0.46), 372(SD 0.43), p<0.01],
and perceived susceptibility [2.90(SD 0.29), 3.79(SD 0.34), 3.79(SD 0.35),
3.83(SD 0,35),p<0.01],and perceived benefits [2.83(SD 0.34), 3.66(SD 0.24),
3.72(SD 0.22), 3.87(SD 0.19),p<0.01] and perceived barriers [4.14(SD 0.29),
2.46(SD 0.32), 2.22(SD 0.39), 2.19(SD 0.40), p<0.01] and confidence [3.08(SD
0.37), 3.77(SD 0.31), 3.85(SD 0.31), 3.83(SD 0.22), p<0.01] and health motivation
[2.94(SD 031), 3.86(SD 0.27), 3.99(SD 0.25), 3.97(SD 0.28), p<0.01]. Differences
between the intervention and control group were a
