Evaluating Disaster Risk Management in Saudi Arabian Public Hospitals: Perceptions and Practices
No Thumbnail Available
Date
2026
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Saudi Digital Library
Abstract
This thesis examines disaster risk management (DRM) within public hospitals in Saudi Arabia
through the perceptions of healthcare workers (HCWs) and the public. Public hospitals face
major DRM challenges, including mass religious gatherings, industrial risks, and regional
disparities. While global developmental frameworks (e.g., Sendai Framework, WHO Health
Emergency & DRM Framework) emphasise preparedness, resilience, and trust, it remains
unclear how stakeholder perceptions can inform effective DRM in Saudi Arabia. To address this
issue, a multi-method design was employed across three studies to assess perceptions of DRM,
and their implications for healthcare resilience. In Study One, 542 HCWs from 22 public
hospitals across four regions were surveyed to assess their perceptions of DRM effectiveness
across the four phases. Overall, HCWs rated mitigation as the most effective function and
preparedness as the weakest. Significant regional disparities were identified: HCWs in the
Central and Eastern regions reported greater confidence across all four phases compared with
those in the Southern region. In Study Two, semi-structured interviews were conducted with 24
HCWs to examine how individual experiences, and organisational, geographical, and systemic
factors shaped perceptions. Thematic analysis of the interviews indicated that strong
leadership, effective communication, and ongoing training enhanced confidence in DRM,
whereas poor infrastructure, weak departmental collaboration, and lack of psychological
support reduced confidence. In Study Three, 436 members of the public were surveyed to
examine trust in hospital DRM, focusing on four areas: perceived preparedness, knowledge of
initiatives, quality of communication, and perceived satisfaction with hospital DRM. Perceived
satisfaction and preparedness were strongest predictors of trust, followed by knowledge of
initiatives, though communication alone had less significance. Collectively, these studies
indicate that DRM practices in Saudi public hospitals can be shaped substantially by
organisational, systemic, and perceptual factors. The findings suggest that key factors for the
effective improvement of hospital resilience include inclusive leadership, equitable resource
distribution, transparent risk communication, and proactive public engagement. These are all
critical factors for preparing healthcare systems to respond to future crises.
Description
Keywords
Disaster Risk Management, Public Hospitals in Saudi Arabia
