Evaluating Disaster Risk Management in Saudi Arabian Public Hospitals: Perceptions and Practices

dc.contributor.advisorDawson, Ian
dc.contributor.advisorKatsikopoulos, Konstantinos
dc.contributor.authorAlshehri, Shahad
dc.date.accessioned2026-04-26T20:12:45Z
dc.date.issued2026
dc.description.abstractThis thesis examines disaster risk management (DRM) within public hospitals in Saudi Arabia through the perceptions of healthcare workers (HCWs) and the public. Public hospitals face major DRM challenges, including mass religious gatherings, industrial risks, and regional disparities. While global developmental frameworks (e.g., Sendai Framework, WHO Health Emergency & DRM Framework) emphasise preparedness, resilience, and trust, it remains unclear how stakeholder perceptions can inform effective DRM in Saudi Arabia. To address this issue, a multi-method design was employed across three studies to assess perceptions of DRM, and their implications for healthcare resilience. In Study One, 542 HCWs from 22 public hospitals across four regions were surveyed to assess their perceptions of DRM effectiveness across the four phases. Overall, HCWs rated mitigation as the most effective function and preparedness as the weakest. Significant regional disparities were identified: HCWs in the Central and Eastern regions reported greater confidence across all four phases compared with those in the Southern region. In Study Two, semi-structured interviews were conducted with 24 HCWs to examine how individual experiences, and organisational, geographical, and systemic factors shaped perceptions. Thematic analysis of the interviews indicated that strong leadership, effective communication, and ongoing training enhanced confidence in DRM, whereas poor infrastructure, weak departmental collaboration, and lack of psychological support reduced confidence. In Study Three, 436 members of the public were surveyed to examine trust in hospital DRM, focusing on four areas: perceived preparedness, knowledge of initiatives, quality of communication, and perceived satisfaction with hospital DRM. Perceived satisfaction and preparedness were strongest predictors of trust, followed by knowledge of initiatives, though communication alone had less significance. Collectively, these studies indicate that DRM practices in Saudi public hospitals can be shaped substantially by organisational, systemic, and perceptual factors. The findings suggest that key factors for the effective improvement of hospital resilience include inclusive leadership, equitable resource distribution, transparent risk communication, and proactive public engagement. These are all critical factors for preparing healthcare systems to respond to future crises.
dc.format.extent324
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14154/78772
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSaudi Digital Library
dc.subjectDisaster Risk Management
dc.subjectPublic Hospitals in Saudi Arabia
dc.titleEvaluating Disaster Risk Management in Saudi Arabian Public Hospitals: Perceptions and Practices
dc.typeThesis
sdl.degree.departmentDecision Analytics and Risk
sdl.degree.disciplineSouthampton Business School
sdl.degree.grantorUniversity of Southampton
sdl.degree.nameDOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
SACM-Dissertation.pdf
Size:
2.01 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.61 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed to upon submission
Description:

Copyright owned by the Saudi Digital Library (SDL) © 2026