Transparency in Supply Chains: Analysing Stakeholder Consultations and Evidence Under the Modern Slavery Act 2015
dc.contributor.advisor | Sidiqqui, Javed | |
dc.contributor.author | Algarni, Afnan | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2025-01-12T08:05:24Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2024 | |
dc.description | This dissertation critically examines stakeholder consultations on the Transparency in the Supply Chain provision of the Modern Slavery Act 2015, employing stakeholder theory to identify key themes and assess how the evidence supports stakeholders' positions. Through thematic analysis, the study reveals three main themes: the importance of transparency and reporting, the debate between voluntary and mandatory regulatory approaches, and the role of corporate responsibility in eradicating modern slavery. The findings highlight divergent perspectives, with corporate stakeholders favouring flexible reporting standards and academics and NGOs advocating for stricter measures. The analysis also underscores the use of empirical evidence, legislative models, and corporate practices in shaping stakeholder arguments. This research contributes to the literature by applying stakeholder theory to explore the consultative processes that influence the Transparency in Supply Chains provision and emphasizes the need for ongoing stakeholder engagement and further research to refine the Act and enhance its effectiveness in combating modern slavery. | |
dc.description.abstract | This dissertation critically examines stakeholder consultations on the Transparency in the Supply Chain provision of the Modern Slavery Act 2015, employing stakeholder theory to identify key themes and assess how the evidence supports stakeholders' positions. Through thematic analysis, the study reveals three main themes: the importance of transparency and reporting, the debate between voluntary and mandatory regulatory approaches, and the role of corporate responsibility in eradicating modern slavery. The findings highlight divergent perspectives, with corporate stakeholders favouring flexible reporting standards and academics and NGOs advocating for stricter measures. The analysis also underscores the use of empirical evidence, legislative models, and corporate practices in shaping stakeholder arguments. This research contributes to the literature by applying stakeholder theory to explore the consultative processes that influence the Transparency in Supply Chains provision and emphasizes the need for ongoing stakeholder engagement and further research to refine the Act and enhance its effectiveness in combating modern slavery. | |
dc.format.extent | 42 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Harverd Refrencing | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14154/74605 | |
dc.language.iso | en | |
dc.publisher | The University of Manchester | |
dc.subject | Modern Slavery Act 2015 | |
dc.subject | Transparency in the Supply Chain | |
dc.subject | Stakeholder Theory | |
dc.subject | Consultations | |
dc.subject | Thematic Analysis | |
dc.title | Transparency in Supply Chains: Analysing Stakeholder Consultations and Evidence Under the Modern Slavery Act 2015 | |
dc.type | Thesis | |
sdl.degree.department | Accounting & Finance | |
sdl.degree.discipline | Accounting | |
sdl.degree.grantor | The University of Manchester | |
sdl.degree.name | Masters of Science |